User:DecemberBMW/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Space for Life

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I wanted to do something with natural science so I thought space for life would be a good choice, as well, it caught my eye.

Evaluate the article
The article has a good introduction. It explained what is “space for life” and where it is located. The article is a little short on information, it covers the 4 sections of the museum, however, could go into further detail about each separate section. The article has a neutral tone and doesn’t present with any bias towards the subject. All the sources appear to come from newspapers or news articles, There appear to be no primary sources of information regarding the topic. As well, all the sources are almost 10 years old, and no new sources have been added. The two sources that had links attached to them, did open up to the news pages they cited. The writing is clear, straightforward and easy to read. There are only two sections in the article, that are both very short and cover a small amount of information. The article is grammatical sound, I found no spelling errors. There are no images attached to the article. There is one comment on the articles talk page. It is discussing the name of the museum itself and the slight differences people see in the name. The article needs information added to it, it is a rather short article. For instance the history of the museum would be a great start! The article is under-developed and needs some work