User:Decross6/David Chariandy/Crmaurik Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Decross6


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Decross6/David Chariandy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section is very concise and well-written, providing the reader with a clear introductory sentence and general summary of the plot and concept of the novel. The article is set up to be structured in an informative way with relevant information about the novel, though this information is still incomplete. Despite this, once complete, everything seems to be relevant and informative. Statements are neutral and factual with no bias, following the template of other similar Wikipedia articles. Everything is concise and the sources so far are current and reliable. The article is well-organized though, typically, lead sections on Wikipedia don't use headings. Provided more information is added to the weaker sections toward the end of the article, I would say this article is on the right track and this group will have an effective and well-written finished product.