User:Deedeeedits/Theater (structure)/Mariposa41324 Peer Review

General info
Deedeeedits
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Deedeeedits/Theater (structure)/Bibliography (only reviewing biblio, nothing done in the user's sandbox, as far as I can see)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Theater (structure):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Bibliography: the three sources cited in the bibliography all look relevant and reputable, and they all serve a distinct purpose for the revisions that will be made, I think using Merriam-Webster for the definition that needed to be defined is a great idea, especially because of how reputable that site is and how widespread it's use is. When it comes to peer-reviewed journals and the like that can be used, I did do some quick searching on Cal Poly's Onesearch and Google Scholar, and I didn't find any articles that applied to this Wiki article, so because of the lack of academically-reviewed content, I think the sources you chose are more than fine, especially because they seem to provide the exact information that you want to incorporate into your edits, so everything looks good there!

Outline in the biblio: Because there's nothing in the sandbox yet, I'm just gonna quickly review the proposed changes written out in the outline. I don't have much/any knowledge about this topic, so after reading the article, there wasn't anything that stood out to me as either missing or not relevant, but I do like how you want to add a clarifying sentence between two other sentences; after seeing that outlined change, I re-read that section of the article with the change in mind, and I definitely think it adds some necessary and relevant clarification. I also like the proposed additions concerning additional info about how Greek culture and Shakespeare fit into theater structure. Overall, I feel like everything you want to add and edit is relevant and well thought out and researched! :)