User:Deedeeedits/Theater (structure)/Mpmill Peer Review

General info
Deedeeedits
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Deedeeedits/Theater (structure)/Bibliography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Theater (structure)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There have no been any edits in the sandbox. But the bibliography has sources that are reliable. Britannica is a reliable source and the articles chosen in the bibliography are neutral and relevant to the topic. There is plenty of information for the editor to use, and nothing in the articles feel to have a bias as they are mostly explaining what theatre's and the different elements to them. The links work and are able to create a citation in the sandbox. All articles written on Britannica have a fact-checker, therefore, the information feels reliable. In regard to the Ancient Greek Theater article, from the layout, it feels unreliable and sketchy. But the website is involved with academia as it has an .edu ending. The information itself is neutral and useful.