User:Dehydrogenase/Biliary tract/Sv290 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dehydrogenase


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Biliary tract
 * Biliary tract

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is concise and is a good introduction to what the biliary tract is and its function. The lead provides a lot of information and is easy to read. It could include a brief description of the article's major sections. The references added to this section are up-to-date.

Content: The content is up-to-date and and is relevant to the topic. There can be more content added in the clinical significance section about cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the content is neutral and it is not heavily biased. The writing is easy to read and easy to follow.

Sources and References: The references added are up-to-date and the links work. The sources are varied, reliable, and current. More references can be added to the clinical significance section.

Organization: The content is well organized and concise. The writing is clear and easy to read. The section on clinical significance may benefit from having separate paragraphs for cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and acute cholangitis.

Images and Media: The images are very useful and detailed. They are labelled and represent the anatomy discussed in the article, making it easy to visualize what the article is saying.

Overall impression: The content added improves the overall article and provides more information on the anatomy of the biliary tract and the clinical diseases associated with the biliary tract. I think the article can expand a little bit more in the clinical significance section with separate paragraphs for the different diseases. The content added can be improved by adding additional references but I like how all the references are from credible sources and up-to-date. Great job!