User:Deidran19/Four Ancient Books of Wales/S531r965 Peer Review

Lead: the lead has not been changed (if I understand what lead is.) all information is the same as it was in the original article

Content: added content describes the content of each of 4 books. it is referenced to secure sources. there is no content that does not belong to the article. the article addresses all the information ethically and historically accurate.

Tone and balance: the added article is neutral. there is no over or under representation and the content does not try to persuade. it is just clear pieces of information.

Sources: it seems that all the sources are reliable and do not come from not secure media. most of the sources are current and the links work if one tries to click on them. however some of the sources are repetitive which is not necessarily a bad thing. hence there may be ways to diversify the reference list.

organization: perfectly organized by books with headers to distinguish between books. there are no grammar errors. all sentences are straight forward.

images: editor did not add images.

overall, editor could add more information for each book, as there are wikipedia articles for each book. but the edits are really useful and clear. good job!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)