User:Deiz/notspe

Wikipedia is not the Stanford Prison Experiment. Administrators are not chosen at random, nor are they personal friends of the management, or people who just happened to get in on the ground floor. Admins are nominated, make statements, are then questioned, evaluated and finally approved by bureaucrats to be given "the mop". They are, without exception, editors with a substantial history of edits, a minimum of sveral months of service and an applied and demonstrated knowledge of Wikipedia policies, guidelines and practices and civility. So if an administrator gives you some advice, reverts or refactors your edit or uses their administrative tools to block an editor, protect or delete an article or otherwise f**k up your day, chances are they know what they're talking about. Are administrators perfect? No. They can have the piss frustrated out of them just as quickly as anyone else. But so would you if you told your child to stop drawing on the wall with crayons for the 4th time that day. Child goes to bedroom, editor gets blocked. Just another day with the mop...