User:Deja.Sams/Bruce Sterling/Daisja30 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Deja.Sams
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Bruce Sterling

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is extremely brief

Lead evaluation
. It can include more information about the author like where he grew up, his background, his education, etc. What is stated in the “personal” section should be moved to the lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? No
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
The content covered is good.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
I did not feel like the article was trying to convince me. The writing section can be broken down better.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No
 * Are the sources current? They are not the most recent.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
I did not see any added sources.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? N/a
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? N/a
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? N/a

Organization evaluation
It appears that what was written was later deleted.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? There was not much added, but what was added seemed to work but has been deleted.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? None
 * How can the content added be improved? Leave what was added.

Overall evaluation
I am assuming that you did not like what you added or felt it was wrong. However, as long as you find a source with what you are adding then you should be fine.