User:Delaney barghols/Jane Eleanor Datcher/Ashleighantrim2100 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Delaney Barghols


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Delaney barghols/Jane Eleanor Datcher


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Jane Eleanor Datcher

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead- I think that overall your lead is good and provides information that is needed to know who Jane Eleanor Datcher was as a woman and what she accomplished.

Article- It is organized well and covers the information that is important about Jane Datcher. I think that since most of this information is covered in the pre-existing article that if possible to find something that was not written about her was added to your portion it would make a difference. Overall though I think that you highlighted good points and the writing was well done.

Sources- All of your sources are used properly and are mostly up to date.

Pre-existing article- I think that since the pre-existing article already has so much information about her that is available it is hard to add onto whats already there but I feel like there were some gaps that you filled in with information. I would removed sentences that mirror the exact pre-existing article though..

Overall, the grammar and information in your article is pretty good. I would just make sure that the information you have is not the exact information that is already posted to the wikipedia page on Jane Eleanor Datcher.