User:Delbel4567/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Caffeine use for sport
 * Article Evaluation
 * Content is relevant. Introduction is clear and concise to opening up the information on of the topic. Clearly stats the article major points of the information. References look clear and reliable. Written neutrally throughout the article. Strengths in the article include the major sections with great detail of information. I would like to this article the most. Some more work that could be added to this article would be more information about the advantages and disadvantages for caffeine. Rated C and doesn't have a talk page.
 * Sources
 * https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2008/05000/Caffeine_Use_in_Sports__Considerations_for_the.47.aspx
 * https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2008/05000/Caffeine_Use_in_Sports__Considerations_for_the.47.aspx

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jonathan-Geiger/publication/12494990_Caffeine_use_in_sports_A_pharmacological_review/links/57ed132608ae93b7fa9711ed/Caffeine-use-in-sports-A-pharmacological-review.pdf

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-014-0257-8

Option 2

 * Anti-inflammatory
 * Article Evaluation
 * The introduction is good and on topic but maybe the order could be switch around to make it more clear on providing information about the section (major) of the article. References look good and reliable. Naturally written with a respectable amount information for the sections. includes a lot of topics for anti-inflammatory drugs. Rated a C grade and has a few topics open the talk page.
 * Sources
 * https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7ecc7bcac2a6d9979e512dc9e84d2aa90667e0a4
 * Sources
 * https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7ecc7bcac2a6d9979e512dc9e84d2aa90667e0a4

Option 3

 * List of drugs banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency
 * Article Evaluation
 * The introduction is clear and concise but doesn't include major sections of the article. No clear references at the end. Things that can be added to the articles would be more information about why certain drugs have been bad. Or maybe include information about a case study/case over the drug. Include the perspective of the athletes that use them in the case of a competition like mentioned in blood doping section. Listed as low-importance and doesn't have an active talk page.
 * The introduction is clear and concise but doesn't include major sections of the article. No clear references at the end. Things that can be added to the articles would be more information about why certain drugs have been bad. Or maybe include information about a case study/case over the drug. Include the perspective of the athletes that use them in the case of a competition like mentioned in blood doping section. Listed as low-importance and doesn't have an active talk page.


 * Sources
 * https://academic.oup.com/jat/article/35/9/608/853018
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657305/

Option 4

 * Doping in sport
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065266006510016
 * https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=bdd9d19b9bce556bd53f769ea9ff1fc4e9731467
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065266006510016
 * https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=bdd9d19b9bce556bd53f769ea9ff1fc4e9731467
 * https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=bdd9d19b9bce556bd53f769ea9ff1fc4e9731467

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources