User:Delightfuldilly/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Anishinaabe

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the story we read in class last week was about the Anishinaabe tribe. As the main article about this diverse group of people, it's important that the article is detailed and unbiased. My first impressions are good: the article is detailed with a good overview and clear sections, although there are a couple of warning messages about citations and formatting.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is very clear and concise, but does not provide an overview of the sections in the article. The content that is present is detailed and relevant, but some relevant topics are not discussed, particularly around Anishinaabe culture and history prior to European contact. Not everything is cited and the section "Relations with European settlers" has a warning banner that the article needs additional citations. The citations that are there are relevant and the links work. The article is fairly well-written, although could be a little more concise and easier to read in places. There are a few images with good captions but they are concentrated mostly in one section. It is part of WikiProjects in multiple states and there are many conversations about how inaccuracies and tone can be improved. I would consider this an article of moderate quality, that is mostly developed and has a good lead section, but adding citations and other topics could fully develop it.