User:Delikitty/Article evaluation

Evaluation for Dynamic array
Yes. Contents in this page was directly related to dynamic array closely.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

The word "Overcome" in "Dynamic arrays overcome a limit of static arrays..." inclined to say dynamic array is better than static array?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Paragraphs were balanced in this page, as well as viewpoints.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

They did work.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Some of the reference were reliable like official Java docs, published books. However, some of them were not:
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The 6th reference linked to a Google group discussion.

The 9th reference linked to a Github repository, which I think is a blog. (It's a popular repository though).

The 13rd reference linked to a website.

In the section of Geometric expansion and amortized cost, it would be helpful to add information about removing elements and inserting elements in different  places of the array, and analyze the costs. It's part of the WikiProject Computer Science.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?