User:Demilynnn/Boscotrecase/Smuppaneni Peer Review

The article does not beat around the bush in any way and starts straight to the point about the grounding, locations and then proceeds straight to details about the villa’s floor plan in the next paragraph. Does the citation for information on room 19 also include information about room 15 and 16? I think it is always tricky to include information about speculations. You did include a citation for the speculation about the medallions under the Black Room section. Separating the next paragraph talking about the medium of art is also clever. Separating the information between Frescoes and The Black Room was smart because there was a lot to say about the Black Room which would’ve been too lengthy under one single section.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)