User:DemonsandLions/Social media intelligence/SadPandaBear Peer Review

In reviewing your assigned article I have the following suggestions on what could be improved:

The lead could possibly be expanded to provide details about specific techniques and tools used by SMI. Natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and social network analysis.

The clarity of the article could be improved to make it more readable and easier to follow. Breaking up longer paragraphs and using heading to organize content.

The article could use more up to date information. The information in the article is older and their have been many developments in the field of social medical intelligence. The article could be improved with more recent research and developments.

The additional of of specific case studies or examples or organizations using social media intelligence could help to illustrate the benefits and drawbacks.

Further development on ethical considerations. The article mentions ethical considerations surrounding social medical intelligence, it could delve deeper into this and provide guidance.

Please let me know if I have missing what you put in your sandbox for a contribution, I did not find it but I may not be looking in the correct spot. ~

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)