User:Denaraxks/Article critique

"I visited the Descendants page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: Only one citation, an unnecessary section, and its more up to date then I expected."

The Descendants page has only one source cited. If the cited source is the only one used then people have used it since 2015 till now to create this page. With only one citation we don't know who wrote this or how many people. We don't know how much of the information came from the cited article or where the information that didn't come from there came from. We don't know how much of the article ,or if any of it, is true. This source might be biased or wrong or even fake. If this source is the only one used it has a lot more information than most sources do. How much information it has makes us doubt it's reliability.

The Descendants page also had an unnecessary section. The page is about the film. The film and the books don't have any connection so having a section about the books is really unnecessary. The Descendants books happen before and in between the films but still contribute nothing to the film. The only connection between them is that they are about the same characters. They don't even tell the same story and the books were written after the movies. The movies were fine before the books were written. This section about the books was totally unnecessary.

One good thing about the page was that it was up to date way more than expected. The Descendants movies came out in 2014 and 15 the page was last edited this year. It even contains news about Descendants 3. This is way more up to date than I expected. I didn't think it would even mention Descendants 2. It even mentioned the seemingly less important points of the plot. There was way more information than i expected from the citations.