User:Denmum/Bing Liu (computer scientist)/Thisismyusername31 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Denmum / Areeb


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Denmum/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bing Liu (computer scientist)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I believe the lead section was preexisting from the original article and I think it does an adequate job of summarizing Bing Liu's career and field of expertise. I think the organization of the article flows well with the new additions that elaborate on association rule mining and sentiment analysis. The lead section does summarize this work and gives an idea of what to expect from the rest of the article. I think a bit more could be added to the lead section to give a more clear idea of what the rest of the article will be about to guide the reader. I think the academic section that comes right after the lead section flows really well because it goes into a summary of Bing Liu's work and what his general career path looks like. I think the sentence structure of the first few sentences could be improved to connect better and sound a bit more formal. But the section does give an effective and concise summary of Bing Liu's work. I think the two added sections gave a lot more clarity into his work and helps to understand what he does. I think the first section on association rules for prediction might be a bit difficult to follow for somebody with no background knowledge on data mining and computer science. So it might be helpful to add a bit more explanation of the basic ideas of association rule mining in order to allow more readers to understand his work deeply. But I think the sentiment analysis does a good job of allowing any reader to have a pretty good idea of Liu's work. The explanations for the definition of opinion lexicons and word targets really helped me understand what sentiment analysis is. I think there could also be more explanation if the article is intended to be understood by a general audience. But if the targetted audience is those who already have a good background understanding of data mining then I think that the current sections are quite detailed. I also found it helpful that citations were provided after each sentence so I know exactly what source to look for.