User:Dennyslimon10/Political psychology/Lmn23 Peer Review

General info
Dennyslimon10
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Dennyslimon10/Political psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Political psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I had never heard of political psychology, so I really enjoyed reading this article! I think the lead does a very good job at defining political psychology, but I think it could be slightly more concise in laying out the rest of the article. I think the content of the overall article is relevant and up to date. I liked that it gave information on political psychology within different countries. With a topic like this, it might be hard to provide information on underrepresented groups, but I think this article handles it very well! The overall tone is neutral. I see where the user has crossed out a few words in the added content that might be perceived as biased. The sources are relevant with links that work. I think there is a good amount of references with differing authors. The article is well organized with sections that flow nicely. There are no images, but I think a few might be good in the sections about different countries (significant individuals mentioned in the sections). Overall, I think this is a very interesting and thorough article. I think the content added has improved the article by adding more history. I am definitely looking forward to reading the final article!