User:Dephiant08/Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on crime/AbleArcher99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dephiant08


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * NA


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on crime

Evaluate the drafted changes
I see there is a section of bibliography for the page, linked here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dephiant08/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_crime/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

I do not see anything yet at this page to review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dephiant08/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_crime?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

I do not see anything at the User's Sandbox to review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dephiant08/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_crime?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

There are edits shown by user here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_crime&action=history

The current published draft, which the user appears to have contributed is evaluated as follows:

The opening section feel disjointed, and it doesn't summarize the article very well. It would be improved if it is converted to an introduction on the topic and brief parts of the major sections. The citation of a policy brief fro the beginning of the pandemic feels very dated compared to where we are today for providing a look at the after effects of the pandemic.

The Crime heading section provides useful numbers and citations, but all of the information appears to be early pandemic information.

The individual crime sections are a reasonable organization of the information and they provide useful links to other articles about each of the topics, but they lack some of the date information that could make them feel complete.

Overall, the information dos not feel up to date, with minimal 2021 sources. The availability of journal literature is likely limited on this topic. The source links tested appear to work.

The information is easy to read and is concise. It appears neutral and non-judgmental.

There is a world view to the information, and it is not US-centric.

There is no media presented.

Overall, the article does not feel like it would stand well on its own, but that makes sense because the article is specifically Part of a series on theCOVID-19 pandemic.