User:Depo808knee/Steve Ramirez/Juliet2454565 Peer Review

General info
Depo808knee
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Depo808knee/Steve Ramirez
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The references and publications are well organized and clearly labeled to provide clarity, and most of these citations appear to have been done correctly. The only one that I was not sure about was the 8th source under "References" as it is possibly missing a title, so it may need to be manually cited if a title can be provided. If not, then the source seems to be cited well overall. I thought the inclusion of the "Publications" section was a very good organization choice, especially for those who may want that information specifically because it is easier to find. Generally, the article was organized well in a way that clearly presented information without being overwhelming.