User:Desalvionjr

About Me!
I Have been a User Of Wikipedia since uhhhh.... Who knows when? I enjoy the wikipedia and use it as one of my main sources but I often double check info on various other sources to verify accuracy! I wish to be a Wikipedia sysop(admin)! I wish that all vandalism on the wikipedia would just stop right now and I think every article has value and potential! I Haven't ever been in an edit war(thank goodness) and never want to be in one! My current goals are:
 * Clean up wikipedia
 * thwart vandals
 * promote eventualism
 * ensure accuracy
 * bridge the gap between Wikipedia and always reliable information
 * And Make The Wikipedia a better place!

A perfect Wikipedia article...


 * fills a gap; search for existing or related articles on the topic first.
 * has a good title so it can be linked to and found easily and follows existingnaming conventions.
 * starts with a clear description of the subject; the leadintroduces and explains the subject and its significance clearly and accurately, without going into excessive detail.
 * is understandable; it is clearly expressed for both experts and non-experts in appropriate detail, and thoroughly explores and explains the subject.
 * is nearly self-contained; it includes essential information and terminology, and is comprehensible by itself, without requiring significant reading of other articles.
 * branches out; it contains wikilinks and sources to other articles and external information that add meaning to the subject.
 * and branches in; editors have found and edited other significant wiki pages which make mention of the topic and link them to the article.
 * acknowledges and explores all aspects of the subject; i.e., it covers every encyclopedic angle of the subject.
 * is completely neutral and unbiased; it has a neutral point of view, presenting competing views on controversies logically and fairly, and pointing out all sides without favoring particular viewpoints. The most factual and accepted views are emphasized, and minority views are given a lower priority; sufficient information and references are provided so that readers can learn more about particular views.
 * is of an appropriate length; it is long enough to provide sufficient information, depth, and analysis on its subject, without including unnecessary detail or information that would be more suitable in "sub-articles", related articles, orWikimedia sister projects.
 * reflects expert knowledge; it is grounded in fact and on sound scholarly and logical principles.
 * is precise and explicit; it is free of vague generalities and half-truths that may arise from an imperfect grasp of the subject.
 * is well-documented; all facts are cited from reputable sources, preferably sources that are accessible and up-to-date.
 * is clear; it is written to avoid ambiguity and misunderstanding, using logical structure, and plain, clear prose; it is free of redundant language.
 * is engaging; the language is descriptive and has an interesting, encyclopedic tone.
 * follows standard writing conventions of modern English, including correct grammar, consistent verb tense, punctuation and spelling.
 * includes informative, relevant images—including maps, portraits, photographs and artworks—that add to a reader's interest or understanding of the text, but not so many as to detract from it. Each image should have an explanatory caption.
 * '''is categorized.
 * has interlanguage links if possible.
 * is not attainable. Editing may bring an article closer to perfection, but ultimately,perfection means different things to different editors. For more information, see ourediting policy.

UserBoxes
I HAVE MORE USERBOXES|!