User:Desantisc/sandbox

Article Improvements and Additions
"Speech pathologist not only work with adolescence with speech and language impediments, but also those that are elderly."

"Cognitive Communication is also an area that speech pathologists work to improve. This can include thinking skills such as memory, attention and problem solving."

"Besides a school setting, many speech pathologists work in hospitals aiding those in regaining their language and speech abilities back after treatment."

"Speech Pathologists are required to have Master's degree as well as be licensed. The license must be renewed every two years in order to be valid for practice."

"Speech Pathologist can do many things with their degree. They can train future professionals, manage a private practice or clinic, engage in research to enhance knowledge and develop new methods."

"Speech Pathologists work as part of a team alongside teachers, counselors, social workers and parents when in a school setting."

Speech-Language Pathology
Speech-language pathology

This topic is covered on Wikipedia but has content gaps and could use more information on the subject. Since I did my research paper on this topic, I am familiar with the subject and can help give more input that can strengthen the article.

Wikipedia is in need of citation verification as well as different perspective to create understanding world-wide.

5 Articles
Lemonade

Italian language

Sign language

Speech-language pathology

Spanish language

Literature

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, everything in the article was relevant to the topic. Nothing distracted me.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is about literature, therefore it was informing the reader about what literature is, its forms and the history of literature.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, very neutral and factual.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Yes.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Many people commenting on the article are Literature Professors and are saying the information is irrelevant and not accurate. From a student's POV, it gave me more insight on literature than I knew before. If it needs to be edited it is best done so by a Literature Professor.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, in every WikiProject it is graded a C
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia goes more in depth on the topic and goes into the different types of literature, its forms and the history. In school, we go over these just not as in depth as the article does.