User:DetectivePrince/Education and the LGBTQ+ Community/Majaterzic8 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Detective Prince
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:DetectivePrince/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Not yet
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Not yet
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Not yet
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Could have more up to date evidence supporting their claims
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * In the process of editing, I would a section about the misleading 'causal' links to school shootings and how they are biased (e.g., mental illness)

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Some other topics could be added as you only have 2 sections right now
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * I would add more citations, you reference one but adding the citation at the bottom would be helpful
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * No
 * Are the sources current?
 * No
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * No

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * NA
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * NA
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * NA

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Overall, I would say that there could be more added to the topic
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * I like having academic and mental effects, I am interested to see what more you add
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Adding more content - including various aspects of school shootings

Overall evaluation
Overall, I would say this is a good start! I would recommend adding more current references, this way it is the most up to date information. Further, I would recommend to add another section that isn't just on the effects of school shootings. There are common misconceptions about school shootings and the media often to favour certain perpetrators of violence rather than others. I have a few articles on this topic if you want me to send you them let me know. :)