User:Devlin Vong/Agate/Abbyfah Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Devlin Vong
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Devlin Vong/Agate

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes the lead has been updated to reflect the new content added.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes the lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes, for the most part there is a brief description of the article's sections.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No the lead does not include information that is not present in the article.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead is concise.

Lead evaluation
Well Done

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes the content added is relevant to the topic.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes the content added is up-to-date.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No there does not seem to be any missing content or content that does not belong.

Content evaluation
Well Done

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

Yes the content added is neutral.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No there seems to be no heavy bias.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No there are not any viewpoints overrepresented or underrepresented.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No the content is factual with no bias.

Tone and balance evaluation
Well done

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes all new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes the sources are thorough.


 * Are the sources current?

Yes the sources are current.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes the links work.

Sources and references evaluation
Well Done

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes the content is well written but I am confused on which parts of the article Devlin is correcting and where the new info is going in the article.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No there are no grammatical or spelling errors.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

No the content added is not well-organized.

Organization evaluation
Good

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

No images have been added.


 * Are images well-captioned?

N/A


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

N/A


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

N/A

Images and media evaluation
N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

Yes the content added has improved the overall quality of the article.


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

The strengths of the added content is the minimization it brings to a lot of information written very concisely thus, not over detailing and confusing readers.


 * How can the content added be improved?

The content can be improved by adding images.

Overall evaluation
Well Done!