User:Devonwinquist/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Medical cannabis

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have family members who use cannabis for medical purposes and it is a general topic of interest for me. This is also a topic with frequent changes and updates, so I'm curious to evaluate and see what can be changed about this specific page.

Evaluate the article
The lead of this article is strong and concise, providing a direct perspective for readers. However, it lacks an overview of the different topics covered. Moving into the body and sections, the content remains relevant to the topic of medical cannabis, supported by up-to-date sources and findings. The tone of the article is generally neutral, although there are instances where the wording appears to have a negative bias, such as the use of "mental disorders" instead of a more neutral term like "mental health". Overall, the article maintains a neutral stance. The inclusion of images enhances the reader's understanding without causing distraction. The talk page primarily consists of discussions about minor changes, such as rewording and the reasons behind certain edits or removals. While this article is well-developed, it could benefit from further rewording, additional sources if necessary, and reorganization for better overall structure.