User:Devyanidhar/Luisa Amanda Espinoza Association of Nicaraguan Women/Tnzuve Peer Review

General info
Devyanidhar & Kamorales23
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Devyanidhar/Luisa Amanda Espinoza Association of Nicaraguan Women
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Luisa Amanda Espinoza Association of Nicaraguan Women

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Is there a strong opening sentence or phrase? Yes, there’s a strong opening sentence. It mentions the initial name of the organization and includes its current name, as well as the spanish versions and the english translations.
 * 2) Is there sufficient attention to the larger historical, cultural, or geographic context? There is sufficient attention to the larger historical, cultural, and geographic context. The article makes mention of AMNLAE’s affiliation with the FSLN, another prominent organization in Nicaragua’s history of resistance groups. The article also discusses the overall importance of AMNLAE and their role in women’s organizations in Latin America as a whole.
 * 3) Is there a broad framing of the topic and attention to other related Wikipedia pages? There is a broad framing of the AMNLAE and other related wiki pages. Since the AMNLAE has close ties to the FSLN, the wiki page on FSLN is referenced throughout the article. Anastasio Somoza Debayle’s wiki is also referenced, given that the AMNLAE operated during Debayle’s regime. Additionally, the article mentions the wiki article on the emancipation of women.
 * 4) Is there a strong organization and structure of the wiki? The article has good structure and nice flow when reading aloud. I do suggest that the sections should have headings, just so it makes it easier for the reader to know what stage of the organization they’re reading about. This will help strengthen the organization and the visualization of the article.
 * 5) Are there a range of substantive and high-quality sources? The article includes sources from authors that we’ve read in class, which makes it easier to read since we’re already familiar with the work and writing styles of the authors.
 * 6) Do these sources work well together to illuminate a topic in compelling ways? The sources do work well together to illuminate the topic in compelling ways.
 * 7) Is there any biased language? There is no biased language.
 * 8) Any feedback on grammar and style? I have no feedback on grammar and/or style, given that it’s written well.
 * 9) Is the language clear, accessible, and impartial? The language is clear, accessible, and impartial. The article is written in a way that details the AMNLAE’s history in a concise way that's easy to understand.
 * 10) Are there visual materials? There are currently no visual materials.
 * 11) Any other suggestions? I would suggest including at least one piece of visual material, since it’s a short article.