User:Dexvn/Saxitoxin/Theheathbar01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dexvn


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dexvn/Saxitoxin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Saxitoxin

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The article covers the source of saxitoxin in nature, structure, mechanism, biosynthesis, illness/poisoning, and military interest - all topics that directly relate to saxitoxin. Nothing in the article distracted me as I read it.

The article reads very neutrally, and does not appear to have a bias towards any viewpoint. It presents the information very professionally.

I do not believe there are any viewpoints that are over- or under-represented in the article, it covers the major topics and answers questions that come up as I read the article.

The links I tested all worked, there do not appear to be any dead links. There are some old sources that should be replaced or updated, that are from the early 2000s and before.

The facts presented in the article are all supported with citations, which appear to all be reliable. They are from neutral scientific journals/articles, studies on the topic, etc. There does not appear to be any bias towards certain viewpoints.

Some of the sources used for information are out of date and old. They should be replaced with updated sources, as they are from anywhere from the 1970s - early 2000s. I did not see anything that was missing from the article.