User:Dezhengl/Raymond D. Austin/Keyiw5 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * I am reviewing De Zheng's article.

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dezhengl/Raymond D. Austin

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content is related to the topic. I can clearly see the timeline; what happened in specific years. It has a reference on the bottom of the page. I can see where the resources come from. But there is no image in the draft, readers may lack imagination about the contents. The content is added in neutral. And it has different subtitle which can clearly show readers distinct parts.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)