User:Dfee2/Sexual capital/Milest303 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Dfee2
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dfee2/Sexual capital

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The only place I could see needing more content is under the economic definition

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, the criticism section helps with this
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, especially when taking into account literature on the topic being very limited
 * Are the sources current? Yes, all less then 10 years old.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? All Links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the factors section was not very detailed before, and what did exist was not properly verified/cited. There was also no criticism section, thus adding a new viewpoint.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The new content provides a better understanding of what determines sexual capital. There is less missing/unknown factors compared to before. Also, the criticism section now shows opposing viewpoints which previously were not there.
 * How can the content added be improved? What was added seems pretty good to me. The only thing I can think of is additions to other sections.