User:Dg954/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Where's Wally?

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I did not know that his work has previously been challenged/censored for its content, so I wanted to learn more about why this is so. I remember interacting with these types of books during my childhood and can't think of a reason as to why this type of literature would be considered worthy of censorship. I'm curious to know if these controversies are included in the entry at all, and if they have been developed enough.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: The lead section for this article is for the most part effective as the first sentence gives a brief yet straightforward description on what the book series is, while the rest of the first paragraph describes the nature/purpose of this type of literature. The lead section further provides a 'Contents' page which reveals the other sections of the article. Furthermore, the lead section references other TV programming that have come as a result of the book series, a topic which is elaborated on later in the article. The lead is overall very concise and straightforward providing basic information on what the book series entails.

Content Section: All of the information mentioned in the article is relevant as it relates to the "Where's Wally" book series in some way. Though the content is up to date, I noticed that there are certain sections, specifically in the television series section, which can be elaborated on and include up to date information. The most recent information posted in this section mentions an anticipated TV series debut for 2019, though there is no additional entry beyond that explaining any other developments. The article does not have an entry section on the book series' issues with censorship/being challenged by schools, which I think is useful and relevant information that can be discussed.