User:Dharris221/Coach Carter/Benohara Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Dharris221
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y5CVo6zUSlDtGv4DY8bPUI_tB8GjfPiT0bHHTtWNRNw/edit?ts=5f283c12

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The Lead is good in that it covers a lot of what the movie is about. However, it could be condensed and made less wordy. Some of the content in the Lead would be better placed in a Background section.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The additions to the Plot section are helpful for the reader to have a clearer idea of what is going on in the movie. The Production section content is useful, but it should be placed in a background section as most of it does not concern the Production of the movie at all.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the article is mostly neutral, and a number of sources are used for balance. The tone in the additions in the Critical Reception section could be made more neutral and less casual.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are good evidence for the claims made in the article. One sentence in the critical reception section needs a citation to back up the claim.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is organized into clear sections which help the reader understand all of the aspects of the movie. Some content in the Lead and Production sections should go into a Background section because it does not belong in the sections it is currently in.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The images are useful for the reader's understanding and adhere to copyright regulations.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The content added to the Plot section is very helpful. The Lead section should be condensed. Some content in the Production and Lead sections should be placed in a Background section where it would be more relevant. Some content in the Reception section should be edited to produce a more neutral tone.