User:Dharris221/Coach Carter/JSibley20 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Dharris221
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dharris221/Coach Carter

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? YES
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? YES
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? YES
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? YES
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? YES

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, I like how he brings forward that education was his number one priority.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, it is the most relevant to the movie.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, all the information appears to be there.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? There is one part that is not neutral to me and that is at the end when he calls Timo Cruz a "thug"
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? When Timi Cruz is called a "thug" it implied that he does not like him.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? NO
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? he does bring his own facts in when he says that Coach carter was a good coach in real life.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, he does use good sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Checked 3 and they worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, I like how it really expands on the film.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, spelling and grammar are good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are no images.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes ,it added more context around the movie.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the strengths are adding how education was important and that is why the season was canceled.
 * How can the content added be improved? Take out opinions on how the coach "was" and take out the word "thug" when describing someone.

Overall evaluation
Good additions to the article Well placed wording.