User:Dharris221/Coach Carter/Yasmin.Brennae Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Dante Harris
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y5CVo6zUSlDtGv4DY8bPUI_tB8GjfPiT0bHHTtWNRNw/edit?ts=5f282c77

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Lead evaluation
I believe that the lead has to much jumbled into it, the original content was enough for the lead section. However, the new content that Dante added was too much, that information can be added to the background of the movie or into its own section.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
Content wise everything is good, all information there seems needed, but maybe not tell the whole story in the article just give key points of the movie.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There are no citations for the new things added
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Not sure
 * Are the sources current? Not sure
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Not sure

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Not all the information is concise and easy to read most of it is written as if you were explaining this movie to a friend.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images added
 * Are images well-captioned? No images added
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images added
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images added

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Goes more in depth into the movie
 * How can the content added be improved? be more clear and concise