User:Dharris221/sandbox

Evaluating article July 15

 * Name of article: (link)- Julio Lamas
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.- I chose this article because it is short and it should have a lot of updated information. Also because I'm interested in basketball so I feel like it would be interesting to evaluate.

Lead
Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?- yes it gives us a brief description of the what the article is going to be about
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?- yes it gives a brief outlook of it
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?- to my understanding, no it doesn't
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?- it's concise it's very short but the way they lay the information is good

Content
Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?- yes it tells us everything how Julio's coaching career.
 * Is the content up-to-date?- from my understanding I would think it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?- no I feel like everything in the article Is a good fit for it

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?- yes it tells us the main points of his career.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?- to my understanding, no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?- no I feel like they presented them good.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?- no it's just telling us about Julio's coaching career.

Sources and References
Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?- for it to a short article I feel like it is
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?- yes they are
 * Are the sources current?- yes most of the sources are in the 20's
 * Check a few links. Do they work?- the links work fine

Organization
Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?- yes it is very easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?- I couldn't find any
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?- the article is organized great.

Images and Media
Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?- it shows us the image of Julio and what he looks like.
 * Are images well-captioned?- the one image is captioned good
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?- yes because if it didn't it would've been gone because Wikipedia is quick to remove those things.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?- it's laid out fine

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?- to me, no
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?- the article is rated start-class
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?- I'm not really seeing a difference.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?-I feel like it is good.
 * What are the article's strengths?- straight to the point type of article.
 * How can the article be improved?- maybe some information on what he is doing now
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?- well-develped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~

Evaluating article July 16
 * Link to feedback:

BIGROPHAY


 * Lead section.- yes there is information to give us an incite on the article
 * Early life: Context for childhood, hometown, and early experiences relevant  to their later careers.- it doesn't really give us information on his childhood. It just tells us where he is from and his career.
 * Career, actions, or defining experiences, provided chronologically and with  historical context.- yes it gives information on his career, action, and experiences.
 * Legacy: Major contributions to their fields.- his legacy is pretty good he won a couple of championships being a coach.
 * Publications or other works.- doesn't say anything.
 * Summary- basically an article about a coach named Julio Lamas and it talked about his coaching career.
 * Career: Academic credentials and universities attended, presented  chronologically and with context.- doesn't give us information on where he intended college or anything.  • Research contributions: A brief description  of their impact on the field.You can list awards and honors, but only if those awards and honors are themselves notable.- won 5 Argentine League Championships   • Legacy: A list of their most notable (or most-cited) papers and publications.- not any
 * Things that should be added to the article
 * early life
 * any other passions
 * Personality
 * does he have any children
 * who is his parents