User:Dhernandez98/Philosophy of happiness/KeneliaWilliams Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?  Daniel Hernandez
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dhernandez98/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes it has been updated
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? All of the content added is relevant to the topic of philosophy is happiness.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The content that was added is up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The content that was added was missing information that helped the article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes the content was neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No there is no claims that appear heavily baised.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No there is no persuade to the reader.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? For the most part yes. There is only a few which was stated would be provided later on because of some issues.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes the sources is accurate to my knowledge.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Everything I read was clean and easy to read for other readers.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Just a few.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content was well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discover able?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the article needed some of the content that was added to make the article better.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths of the content was the paragraph that was added to the work that was already there. It made it more interested.
 * How can the content added be improved? The content added can be improved by trying to find some more information with more sources.

Overall evaluation
This was a good article to edit and the content that was added and content that was deleted made the article better for readers who will read about this topic.