User:Diarcane/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nanochemistry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Nanochemistry is a topic that I'm insterested in but not that familiar with. I think the experience could be more direct if I read an article on wikipedia as a newcomer, someone who doesn't really know the topic well, to see how this article helps me understand the new knowledge.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is quite straightforward. It is concise enough for any reader to grab a rough idea of what Nanoscience is. It leads to the main sections that follow.

The contents of the article are mostly related in terms of the applications and researches. However, the first two sections in the main part seem to be abrupt since they are not mentioned at all in the lead section. Their relevance to nanochemistry is doubtful, or at least not well explained. According to some of the citations, not all the contents are up-to-date, many dated from 1990s and 2000s.

The article is written in a neutral tone.The main focus on certain topics are somewhat more detailed, but generally unbiased. It does show a variety of perspectives and isn't in favor of one specific idea. The application part is underrepresented to some degree, especially the Catalyst part. The layout of the aritcle is somewhat disordered as the classification under the applications of Nanochemistry are not well organized. And the explanations under certain topics are too brief for readers to further understand. There are no images or media that support the explanation of some ideas, which might makes it harder for readers to understand the ideas.

Many ideas in the article are supported by various citations. But as I mentioned above, many ideas are underrepresented, there is still a lack of citations explaining some topics.

The talk page of this article is rarely used. The messages in the talk page was about the citation of some ideas. It is a part of WikiProject Chemistry. The quality scale is Start-Class and has been rated as Mid-importance on importance scale.

Obviously, this article is underdeveloped and still requires a lot of fillings in terms of the definition, more detailed applications, better catogonization and up-to-date related studies.