User:Diarcane/Nanochemistry/Cayeung Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Xiaoxu Qing, Yungad


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Xiaoxu Qing/Nanochemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nanochemistry

Review by Cayeung
I like the changes made to the lead section, where there are more citations within the text. I also appreciate how the section was reworded to be in active voice, making the content more engaging. Citations are done well, accompanied with working links. However, there are a few aspects that can be improved upon. Here are my suggestions:


 * Not sure if my interpretation is incorrect, but the two points to be added in the applications section seem to fit better within the medical subsection rather than have their own subsections, so I would move those points to the medical subsection.
 * Consider expanding on the Nanothermodynamics section, such as adding recent studies or advancements in that field. As of now, it seems like nanothermodynamics could go under applications.
 * Images/media! I noticed that the original article also did not have any figures to support the text, but maybe this can be improved upon. It is difficult to read such a large chunk of text, breaking them up with figures or media would help a lot. This can include adding pictures of some materials used for nanochemistry, or figures showcasing the several applications listed. This will greatly enhance the understanding for the reader.
 * What are some recent advancements in nanochemistry? If applicable, look into recent literature in this field and this can be included as another section.
 * From the introduction, nanochemistry is associated with "the synthesis of building blocks", perhaps there are some studies detailing this synthesis and this could be a potential section of the article?
 * Grammatical errors/run-on sentences: There is some punctuation missing in "...production of matter under nano scale [.] Chemistry mainly deals with the degrees of freedom of atoms in the periodic table [,] however nanochemistry brought other degrees..." in the lead section.

Overall, well done! I think you guys improved this article significantly. I'm excited to see what the final draft looks like!