User:Diego CD/Women's National Basketball Association/Hcn27 Peer Review

General info
Diego CD's group
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Diego CD/Women's National Basketball Association
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Women's National Basketball Association

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is clear and brief without going into too much detail. I think the content this group has added is successful in being neutral and informative with no leaning bias. In the "Key Factors" section, you may want to add a specific source for the sentence, "some authors arguing that the NBA should be doing more to support the WNBA if they want the league to succeed" just to add more clarity to which authors say this (although I do see a similar sentence below this one has a source (#2) so it may come from this same article. In the "Revenue and Viewership" section, maybe you could just reword a few things to make the sentence structure and grammar more professional. For instance, you could change "the amount of money players get paid" to "player salaries" or something similar to match the tone of the rest of the article. In the future of the WNBA section, I'd make sure to add a dollar sign to the 60 million vs 10 million to clarify. Those are the only little details I see that could be changed, but overall, I think your draft is really well done! The writing is done well, and all the information you presented is very important and easy to understand. The sources all seem reliable and current. I do think the future of the WNBA section is missing a citation since you mention specific data. This is a really good start to your article, and I think just tweaking these few things will make it ready to publish. If you want to add any more information, maybe you could add details on how the difference in wage is still uneven even with differences in revenue and viewership.