User:Difei Shi/Flame test/Ccustodi Peer Review

General info
Difei Shi
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Difei Shi/Flame test
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Flame test

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

Significant changes have been made to the lead that reflect and effectively summarize the content added to the article. The first sentence of the lead is a concise summary of the article. while the lead effectively summarizes the article, I believe that it is too long and overly detailed.

Content:

All content added to the article is relevant to the article topic. While some of the sources cited are old, most citations are recent and all content added is up to date. Some images are missing from the table, but apart from that no missing information can be identified.

Tone and balance:

All content within the article is neutral.

Sources and references:

There are no citations for information in the lead section. All facts, assertions, and information included within the lead section must be cited. All other sections have been cited sufficiently. most citations are current and reflect the information available on the topic. Additionally, the sources are written by a variety of authors and are a vide variety of sources.

Organization:

This article is very well written and is easy to understand. I did not spot any grammatical or spelling errors throughout the article.

Images and Media:

Images and media were appropriately captioned and help the reader understand the topic of the article. It would be helpful to fill in the blank image boxes in the table of common elements since is a very good figure which helps the reader visualize what the flame of each element looks like.