User:DigbyOD/sandbox

The condition of human sexuality in America has too long been trapped in bondage to shalt. Prior to this state, man has enjoyed almost complete freedom in his choice of sexual activity so long as force, undue seduction, or guile is perpetrated. Sure, rape, pillage and plunder was the name of the game on the frontier but, in civil society, tens of thousands ago there was no concept of sex as sin. The rules were based on the idea of mutual consent. It was like, monkey see monkey do but do not force or offend; the whole object being that the passion of men can best be met through outlet. Prostitution of women was allowed and usually conducted in the precincts of the Temple. Boy on boy was reproved if indulged to excess. After all, the main object of man was to procreate, not to diddle other guys or little boys. And those that persisted in their boyish passions were considered fit for severe approbation, even an emperor of Rome. There is little doubt that there were constant problems, but there was a real moral code, and it worked despite the times. Why was this so? Probably because man had learned this code as a natural consequence of thousands of centuries of evolution. It was not imposed as a Shalt. The only way out of this trap of sexual abuse, even criminal action, is to allow mans sexual ability; not condemn it. Digby