User:Digi227Bravo/Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge/Ty.olkkola Peer Review

General info
Digi227Bravo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Digi227Bravo/Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge

Lead
Your lead looks good, it gives a good overview of your topic without going too much in-depth.

Content
Everything you've added looks good so far! If you're looking for more material to add, I think it wouldn't be difficult to beef up the section on Fauna in the main article, and you could definitely add a section on Flora for plant life within the refuge. I noticed your heading for ecological impact, which will also be a good inclusion!

Tone and Balance
Your edits have a neutral tone and don't suggest any bias.

Sources and References
The sources you have are good, but I would definitely add some more to make the article more credible.

Organization
Everything seems pretty well formatted and follows a logical flow. I can see where you're headed with the notes in your draft, and I think those will add to the overall organization.

Images and Media
There are some good images in the main article, but it might be nice if you were able to find some older images of the refuge for the history section, which is your biggest piece of the article right now.

Overall Impressions
Really good start so far, all your content seems relevant and it looks like you have some good plans for the rest of the article.