User:Dikshas05/Julie Morning After Pill/Dianwakeham Peer Review

General info
dikshas05
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dikshas05/Julie_Morning_After_Pill/Dianwakeham_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead has updated to reflect the new content added by my peer and gives a brief overview of the goal of the product. The Lead includes an introductory sentence but does not cover all the sections shown throughout the wikipedia page. There is no new information in the Lead that is not said on the web page and is very concise. The content added is relevant and up to date, including recent articles and facts. The article addresses the wikipedia equity app by including that Julie donates every time the product is bought to victims of domestic abuse, indigenous people, HBCUs, and more. The content added is neutral and no claims are heavily biased towards a specific position. I think that the system of donating their product is under-presented and that it should be highlighted more in the article. All the new content has a link that and/or other information already said in the article and reflects available literature on the Julie pill. The content accurately reflects the cited sources like the side effects, needs of Black women, etc. I think that the article is good and provides facts that are supported by various links.