User:Diveguy1/Suicidal ideation/Embur15 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Diveguy1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Suicidal ideation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Suicidal ideation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I thought that there was a good leading sentence. The topic was relevant to the content that was added. It was up to date and I didn't think anything was missing. The tone and balance was really good too. There wasn't anything that was biased or was trying to persuade the reader. The sources and references were good and the article is organized very well.