User:Diyadang/Bond energy/Ts2023tv Peer Review

General info
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Diyadang/sandbox
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Diyadang/sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, the content and all information added is relevant to the topic. I like how you added new sections and expand and elaborate on the examples given in the original Wikipedia article to explain the concept presented in the article, which helps make the article more clear and succinct, and very helpful to readers.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Content is up-to-date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? N/a
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? N/a

Tone and Balance
The article does not have a problem with tone and balance, no bias, no underrepresentation or overrepresentation of viewpoint

Sources and References

 * All new content seems to have reliable and appropriate references that accurately reflects the available literature on the topic of your article. You have a good and diverse range of sources and references compared to the original Wikipedia page. The first paragraph had some changes that included a few literature sources cited for just definitions of words that seem unnecessary.
 * Some cited articles are not open access and some textbook sources are not accessible.

Organization

 * Content is well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read.
 * Content added well-organized

Images and Media
No Images and Media added

Overall impressions

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - The article has definitely been improved and is a lot more complete. The last section, Factors affecting ionic bond energy, could use more content, still basic and undeveloped.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content added makes the article more comprehensible and easy to understand.