User:Diyadang/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * -ene:
 * Article Evaluation:The content is relevant to the article and is all written neutrally. Only one reference is given and it only appears once in the article following the first claim. It is a relatively old book from 1965 but is otherwise scholarly and reliable. The article in no way mentions or addresses any of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The talk page for this article is blank. The article could be improved by adding more references, examples of how the -ene suffix is used, and a more extensive background of where the suffix originates from.
 * Sources:1. “-ene, Comb. form.” Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford UP, July 2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/8259309754 .::

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Relationship between Physics and Chemistry:
 * Article Evaluation:The content is relevant to the article and is all written neutrally. However, this appears to have not always been the case since the talk page features old discussions about how the article reads like a long biased novel instead of a neutral source of information. Two references are given, but they are both associated with a single claim at the end of the article while other claims at the beginning of the article lack any. Both sources come from encyclopedias of philosophy which are certainly reliable in their own rights but a journal article written by a philosopher on the subject would have likely been better. The article in no way mentions or addresses any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.:
 * Sources:::

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Bond energy:
 * Article Evaluation:The content is relevant to the article and is all written neutrally. Eleven references are offered but six of them are from before the year 2000 and one of them from 2013 appears to be a shady website instead of a scholarly source. All major claims are back by sources but some of these sources may need to be replaced with newer versions. Besides the shady website, however, all of the sources appear to be reliable, even the old ones. The article in no way mentions or addresses any of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The talk page is not very densely populated. The most recent discussions surround re-writing certain sections and adding a few explicit examples of the topic.
 * Sources:1. Yu-Ran Luo. Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies; Crc Press ; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, 2007.:2. Smith, D. W. Additive Bond Energy Scheme for the Calculation of Enthalpies of Formation and Bond Dissociation Energies for Alkyl Radicals. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1996, 92 (22), 4415. https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9969204415 . ‌

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Diazine:
 * Article Evaluation:The content is relevant to the article and is all written neutrally. Only one reference is given and it only appears once in the article as a citation for a definition that was given. It is from a relatively old handbook of chemistry from 1991 but is otherwise scholarly and reliable. The article in no way mentions or addresses any of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The talk page for this article is blank. The article could be improved by adding more references and more information about the properties and reactivities of these compounds that could be gathered from research papers featuring diazines.
 * Sources:1. Katritzky, A. R. Handbook of Heterocyclic Chemistry; Elsevier: Oxford, 2010. 2. Elsevier. The Handbook of Infrared and Raman Characteristic Frequencies of Organic Molecules; 1991.
 * 3. Alexander Yu. Sokolov; Schaefer, H. F. Coordination Properties of Bridging Diazene Ligands in Unusual Diiron Complexes. Organometallics 2010, 29 (15), 3271–3280. https://doi.org/10.1021/om100098t.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Isolobal Principle:
 * Article Evaluation:The content is relevant to the article and is all written neutrally, but is mostly focused on the works of a single person. Although this is not ideal, it is necessary in this case since the principal described was almost entirely formulated by a single person who won a Nobel Prize for their work. Several references are given and almost all of them are scholarly journal articles or official statements from the Nobel Committee. Only three of the references are from after the year 2000, though, so so may need to be updated. One of the references also appears to be incomplete, featuring only the name of the document without a date or authors. The article in no way mentions or addresses any of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Surprisingly, despite the article's size, its talk page is blank.
 * Sources