User:Djmcclain02/Evaluate an Article

Lead section

1. yes

2. yes, it gives specific aspects of the sport.

3. No, it specifically explains what basketball is.

4. the lead is slightly over detailed

Content

1. the articles content stays on topic

2. the sources date back to 2010 but does not effect relevant information.

3. no

4. yes

Tone and Balance

1.yes

2. yes

3. yes

4. yes

5. no

Sources and References


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) yes
 * 4) yes
 * 5) yes

Organization and writing quality


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * no

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)