User:Djsi2135/Pin-pen merger/Alisondoepker Peer Review

- The lead has been updated

- The lead includes an introductory sentence that describes the topic accurately

- It is unclear if the lead includes a description of the major sections because the major sections aren't published yet

- It is unclear if the lead includes information that is not in the rest of the article because the other sections aren't finished yet

- The lead is concise

- The content is relevant and up-to-date

- There is not content that does not belong, but there is content missing from the sections

- I do not believe the article deals with an equity gap

- The content is neutral

- "The pin–pen merger is one of the most widely recognized features of Southern speech" I am unsure if this is a claim that is true/backed up by a source or if it's okay to make this claim because it is a generalized statement

- The content does not attempt to sway the reader

- The content is easy to read and concise

- I did not note any grammar/spelling issues

- I did not note overrepresented points

- I think the lead is a great start to the article and that, if the rest of the article is written similarly, it will make the article easy to read and understand. I appreciate the references to other wiki pages and I think when the rest of the sections are added it will be easier to evaluate the lead! Outside of that it looks great and professional.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) The pin-pen merger in user Djsi2135 sandbox


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Djsi2135/Pin-pen_merger?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)