User:Djward21/Psychological resilience/Skycbradford Peer Review

General info
Djward21
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Djward21/Psychological_resilience?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Psychological resilience

Evaluate the drafted changes
The first thing I noticed was your addition of an overview section. It was very well written and it definitely needed to be added to the original! The only suggestion I would make to it would be to add another citation or two, just to add credibility. Other than that, it is great!

I am a bit confused about the Lead portion. Are the bolded and italicized words your additions? I saw that it needs a citation for the sentence regarding Emmy E. Werner. I think with the overview and adding that citation there, this would be a great beginning to the original article.

The tone you have in your draft is neutral and in Wikipedia's standards, is acceptable to use.

I noticed two of your four sources were published over ten years ago. They are great additions and can still be used, but I recommend ensuring majority of them are in more recent years (I believe the recommended is anything 10 years or less).

It looks like you are still working on the other sections you have pasted over. I have a couple of suggestions for those, to help you work on them in the future. The Process section is missing some citations. I think adding one or two would add credibility. In the Mixed model section, I think going more into depth of the four main factors would be beneficial for the article.

I hope my feedback has helped. I can't wait to see what you do with your article!