User:Dkell22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Climbing gym

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am an avid climber and when you are climbing you follow a color. I am unsure how someone that is colorblind climbs.

Evaluate the article

 * Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's concise
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * s the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Are minority or fringe viewpoints accurately described as such? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No
 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Need more sources
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes
 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes
 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Not many conversations on site
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Starter class
 * What is the article's overall status? Bad super bare
 * What are the article's strengths? Very concise but missing a lot of info
 * How can the article be improved? Add more content
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped