User:Dkhc03/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Evaluating the article War on Terror.


 * The article is locked from editing. This article is about recent events, so it seems unsurprising this was necessary to try to protect against vandalism.
 * The opening section seems to cast it in a somewhat negative light immediately. Should the rejection of the term "War on Terror" be such a significant portion of the opening paragraphs? The section "History of use of the phrase and its rejection by the U.S. government", one of the first headings, should suffice.
 * The article is extensively sourced, primarily from news organizations.
 * The layout of the article itself seems well-structured.
 * Each section seems to be well-focused on its subject.
 * Each key event's section helpfully contains a link to its specific page for further reading.
 * It has many interesting sections, notably the breakdowns of casualties and costs.

Overall, this seems to be a good article and gives a useful overview of the subject with useful links to further information.