User:DmBrock2/Evaluate an Article


 * 1) Yes,the article includes introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the topic.
 * 2) yes
 * No
 * 1) The lead is concise detailed.
 * 2) yeas
 * No
 * 1) I believe a little information is missing because the article was published in August 2022 and its January 31 2023
 * 2) I believe this article fit in as a underrepresented populations or topics.
 * 3) yes
 * No
 * 1) Underrepresent
 * 2) Minority
 * No
 * 1) yes
 * 2) Yes
 * No
 * 1) No and they do include historically marginalized individuals
 * 2) Yes, there are some better websites
 * 3) The links I check out works.
 * 4) I believe the article is well written because they go in to detail and give you the years etc.
 * 5) The article does not have any spelling errors
 * 6) The article is well organized that explains all parts.
 * 7) Yes it have pictures to go along with the topic.
 * 8) Yes
 * 9) Yes
 * 10) Not all images are laid out in visually appealing way
 * 11) some comments that i seen is people talking about how there are not any wintersports for mixed sex sports.
 * 12) The article is rated as c-class on project and it is a part of wikiprojects.
 * 13) I feel like it more different because you have other people around the world opinions and some have some good points
 * 14) I could not find the overall status for this article.
 * 15) The strength of this article is how they go in to detail and show you about the mixed sports.
 * 16) The article can be improved by updating the article and add more images to where some people get a better idea of the photo
 * 17) I would say the article was underdeveloped because i feel like they could have explained it a little better and add more images so people can know what the sport is and what it look like.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)